<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: :scriptEnabled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itsalleasy.com/2006/01/12/scriptenabled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itsalleasy.com/2006/01/12/scriptenabled/</link>
	<description>...how boring would *that* be</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shawna</title>
		<link>http://itsalleasy.com/2006/01/12/scriptenabled/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 23:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsalleasy.com/2006/01/12/scriptenabled/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say I like your website.  I got it off of nates blog.  If you could please let nate know I said hi.  Have a great day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say I like your website.  I got it off of nates blog.  If you could please let nate know I said hi.  Have a great day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://itsalleasy.com/2006/01/12/scriptenabled/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 04:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsalleasy.com/2006/01/12/scriptenabled/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>I'm starting to feel that the best solution to these problems is to have 2 pages.  Especially when you have a lot of css/javscript based dynamics on the page.  It is just way to complicated and time consuming to come up with solutions that make the page usuable by everyone and still in the end you end up with something less than ideal.  I like the idea of having an extremely simple version of the page and then having the complex pretty and dynamic version of the page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting to feel that the best solution to these problems is to have 2 pages.  Especially when you have a lot of css/javscript based dynamics on the page.  It is just way to complicated and time consuming to come up with solutions that make the page usuable by everyone and still in the end you end up with something less than ideal.  I like the idea of having an extremely simple version of the page and then having the complex pretty and dynamic version of the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
